A surprising clause in Harry Kane’s contract with Bayern Munich allows the striker to return to England at a reduced price, potentially impacting Arsenal’s striker acquisition plans, according to a report from BILD.

Since moving from Tottenham to Bayern Munich, Kane, now 31, has lived up to expectations, scoring an impressive 70 goals in 72 games and providing 22 assists.

The BILD report reveals that Kane’s contract includes a clause enabling him to return to the Premier League. With an eye on Alan Shearer’s record of 260 Premier League goals, which Kane trails with 213, this clause could see him back in England.

The clause can be activated in January of 2025 or 2026, allowing a move in the following summer. Since the 2025 window passed without activation, Kane won’t be moving next summer.

However, if he opts for the clause in January 2026, he could leave for €65m (£54m) in the summer of that year, despite being 32 by then. His performance remains top-tier, not reliant on speed.

The report does not specify whether Kane would return to Tottenham or another club. This scenario could affect Arsenal, who recently failed to sign a new striker in January, notably making a £60m bid for Aston Villa’s Ollie Watkins.

Arsenal might still compete for the Premier League without a new striker, but the situation with Kane adds another layer to their transfer strategy.

Explaining Arsenal’s failed attempts to add more firepower, transfer guru Fabrizio Romano told his YouTube channel: “Probably the most asked question of the deadline day: what are Arsenal going to do?

“What we can say is Arsenal considered several options, dream options like Benjamin Sesko, almost impossible options like Alexander Isak, who were never going to leave their clubs in January.

“But Arsenal understood it was almost impossible to make it happen now, so these two names – Isak and Sesko – remain for the summer.”

On Watkins specifically, Romano added: “Arsenal tried for Watkins a few days ago, but Aston Villa were furious [about the bid arriving] before the Champions League game [vs Celtic].

“Also the transfer fee: £60m add-ons included, were not enough to convince Aston Villa.

“Unai Emery wanted the player to stay and Jhon Duran going to Al-Nassr also had an impact. For Villa, money was no longer needed.”

As previously noted, Benjamin Sesko from RB Leipzig is one of two strikers Arsenal has targeted for the summer transfer window.

However, according to an update by BILD concerning Harry Kane, Bayern Munich views Sesko as one of two potential replacements should Kane decide to leave.

The report stated: ‘Names such as Benjamin Sesko (21/RB Leipzig) or Viktor Gyokeres (26/Sporting) have been discussed internally.

‘Both would cost a high transfer fee of around 70 million euros, but would receive significantly less salary than Kane, who came to Bayern as a top star and earns an estimated 25 million euros a year.’

As previously stated, Kane can’t utilize his exit clause to leave this upcoming summer because he didn’t activate it during the winter transfer window.

Therefore, Arsenal needs to secure a deal for Sesko before Bayern Munich makes their move, especially considering the possibility of Kane returning to England in 2026.

Journalist David Ornstein has disclosed that Aston Villa were open to negotiating a deal with Arsenal for their striker, Ollie Watkins, towards the end of the winter transfer window.

Villa reportedly extended an invitation for Arsenal to discuss terms for the England international, but they were not swayed by Arsenal’s initial £40m bid.

Ornstein noted that Villa were looking for around £60m for Watkins, a price Arsenal deemed excessive considering his age of 29 and their assessment that he wasn’t worth that sum.

Arsenal, under Mikel Arteta, were looking to bolster their attack in January but ended up having a transfer window where they made no new acquisitions.

In a discussion on The Athletic FC podcast, Ornstein emphasized that Villa were at least prepared to engage in talks about Watkins.

However, the significant difference between what Villa valued Watkins at and what Arsenal were willing to pay for the player, described as “world-class” by the Up the Villans YouTube channel, meant no deal was struck.

“On Watkins, naturally these things are not easy when it gets to such a late point in the window. Clearly, Villa gave Arsenal the opportunity to do this deal or have a conversation on the basis of a £60 million possibility.

“That was something clearly Arsenal were not prepared to do at that value for a 29-year-old, who in their eyes is probably not worth that much.

“They decided to suggest around the £40m mark. Villa were being serious when they suggested £60 million because that’s where they value him and if they need to make the numbers work, with PSR and whatever else.

“That’s what they would have been prepared to have a conversation for. We don’t know if it would have led to an offer being accepted, but the door was clearly opened at that level and Arsenal weren’t prepared to go there.”

After Gabriel Jesus was sidelined for the remainder of the season due to ACL surgery, Arsenal aimed to sign a new striker in January.

However, the club did not make any additions to their forward line, which likely means Kai Havertz will feature in nearly every match until the season concludes.

The situation has been further complicated by an injury to Bukayo Saka, who is expected to be out until April after undergoing surgery for a hamstring problem, leaving Arsenal short-handed on the wings.

Currently, Arsenal sit in second place in the Premier League, trailing leaders Liverpool by six points, with Liverpool having an additional match to play.

Arsenal’s next challenge is the second leg of the Carabao Cup semi-final against Newcastle on Wednesday.

As we shift our focus to the summer transfer window, the club enters it without any new January acquisitions but with a financial boost from two sales totaling £30m.

This situation isn’t ideal, potentially leaving Eddie Howe under-resourced for the remainder of the season, especially since we missed out on signing a right-winger and saw squad depth diminish with the exits of Miguel Almiron and Lloyd Kelly.

However, there’s a silver lining: this financial strategy might give us the flexibility needed to significantly upgrade the squad in the summer. Mark Douglas from the i has outlined that Newcastle United will target a centre-back, right-winger, and striker, marking the summer as a pivotal time for squad rebuild after a challenging January.

The club has not significantly bolstered Eddie Howe’s starting lineup in recent transfer windows, but this is expected to change. The need is evident at:

Centre-back, where Fabian Schar, at 33, might need a long-term successor. Names like Illia Zarbanyi from Bournemouth, Marc Guehi, and Ousmane Diomande from Sporting Lisbon have been mentioned.

Right-wing, where despite Jacob Murphy’s progress, the departure of Almiron highlights a need for more depth. Potential targets include Tyler Dibling from Southampton, Johan Bakayoko of PSV, Brentford’s Bryan Mbeumo, and Bournemouth’s Antoine Semenyo.

Striker, with Callum Wilson’s contract winding down and his injury concerns, a new forward to challenge Alexander Isak is crucial. Jonathan David from Lille, who will be a free agent, is among the names being considered, though competition for his signature will be tough.

The coming months will be full of speculation about who might join the team, but these three positions are clearly where the club aims to strengthen.

Newcastle United handed £43m boost v Arsenal after EFL rules banned key duo

Newcastle United, leading 2-0 from the first leg, are set to face Arsenal in the second leg with hopes of securing a spot in their second Carabao Cup final in three seasons. However, the team has had to navigate through some suspension issues in this competition.

In the first leg against Arsenal, Newcastle were missing key players Bruno Guimaraes and Fabian Schar due to suspensions. Both players received bookings in the 3-1 quarter-final victory over Brentford, which, under Carabao Cup rules, led to a one-match ban as they had previously been cautioned in earlier rounds of the competition. Fortunately, these suspensions do not extend beyond the first leg of the semi-final, so Guimaraes and Schar are eligible to play in the upcoming match.

Sean Longstaff also faced a similar suspension scenario, missing the Brentford game. However, once the competition reaches the quarter-final stage, the yellow card suspension rules no longer apply, meaning no player will miss the second leg or a potential final due to accumulated bookings in this tournament unless they receive a red card.

Red card suspensions are different; they carry over across all competitions. For instance, earlier in the season, Fabian Schar was shown a straight red card in a Premier League match against Southampton, resulting in a three-match ban. This ban included missing not only two Premier League games but also a Carabao Cup match against Nottingham Forest.

These nuances in the competition’s rules could play a significant role in how Newcastle approaches this crucial match against Arsenal.

Tino Livramento, Joelinton & Anthony Gordon booked v Arsenal – are they at risk?

Tino Livramento, Anthony Gordon, and Joelinton all received yellow cards in the first leg of the Carabao Cup semi-final last month, raising concerns about their eligibility for the second leg and a potential final. While Joelinton’s participation is uncertain due to injury, Livramento and Gordon are expected to play at St James’ Park. Importantly, any bookings they receive in the second leg won’t affect their availability for the final.

Even a straight red card in the second leg won’t lead to a suspension for the final; instead, it would mean missing upcoming matches in the FA Cup against Birmingham City and in the Premier League against Manchester City and Nottingham Forest. However, a red card in the Premier League or FA Cup within three games before the final would result in a player being suspended for the Carabao Cup final.

Newcastle’s experience from the 2023 Carabao Cup run provides some context. Bruno Guimaraes was sent off in the semi-final’s second leg against Southampton, leading to a three-match Premier League ban, but he was available for the final. In contrast, Nick Pope was suspended for the final after receiving a straight red card in a Premier League match against Liverpool.

The same disciplinary guidelines apply in the FA Cup, where a player booked twice before the semi-final is banned for one game, but red cards carry over across all competitions. Newcastle’s next match is against Birmingham City in the FA Cup fourth round, kicking off at 5:45pm on Saturday.